Spy vs Spy: Danger! Intrigue! Stupidity! Spy vs Spy: Masters of Mayhem Spy vs Spy: Missions of Madness by Antonio Prohias (Watson-Guptill, 2009) I always preferred the black spy.
OK, it doesn't really matter. I just wanted to make my bias known. When I was a very young child, much of the satire in MAD Magazine went right over my head. Many of the movie spoofs were beyond my grasp because I hadn't seen the movies; besides, a lot of the humor was geared for a slightly older audience than my tender self. But I always flipped through the pages eagerly anyway, looking for a few select features that always earned a grin. Spy vs Spy was one of them.
All I knew was he drew silly little wordless strips in which two spies contended for military supremacy and tried constantly to steal each other's secret documents. Their efforts always fell somewhere between ludicrous and ingenious, and it was always a treat to watch them succeed or fail, in either case spectacularly. Sometimes, the losing spy got nothing more harmful than a boot to the rear. In other cases, he might be decapitated, mutilated or blown up. Some examples:
The white spy removes all the floors in a tall embassy building so that when the black spy climbs in a top-floor window, he falls to his death. When the black spy invents a potion to turn himself invisible so he can kick the white spy in the butt, the white spy alters the formula so only his counterpart's clothes disappear, getting him arrested. The white spy poses as a car salesman to get the black spy into an elaborate and indestructible tank that is really a giant slingshot. You'll also love the way the black spy traps the white spy into a marriage with a witch, and the white spy tricks the black spy into turning his submarine upside-down, among others. You'll often be hard pressed to guess if a spy's cunning plan will work, or if the other spy will foil it with an even more cunning counterplan. Spy vs Spy is certainly not high-brow entertainment, having more in common with Looney Tunes than James Bond, but it never fails to amuse. These collections were first published in slightly different form and with different titles in the late 1960s and '70s; after being almost impossible to find for so many years, I am glad to see these long out-of-print volumes reissued for a modern audience. ![]() |
![]() Rambles.NET review by Tom Knapp 26 September 2009 Agree? Disagree? Send us your opinions! ![]() Click on a cover image to make a selection. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |