![]() |
Bram Stoker's Dracula directed by Francis Ford Coppola (Columbia Tristar, 1993) |
Bram Stoker's Dracula has gotten mixed reviews. The title leads you to believe the movie will follow, at least roughly, the book by Bram Stoker, but you quickly learn there is very little similarity to the book. The movie takes our beloved Count Vlad Dracula from his home in Romania to London in search of love.
If you forget the book completely and simply watch the movie for enjoyment, you will be pleased. It delivers enough of the horror aspect. The shadow figure adds a high level of psychological tension, while there is enough blood and gore for anybody. Though I have never been a romance fan, I thoroughly enjoyed this movie. I felt such sympathy for poor Dracula and could not bring myself to view him as a "bad guy." He was just so pitiful in his love and loss. Gary Oldman carried off the role of Dracula to perfection. He moves through the different changes with total credibility. His lines are believable and are delivered with strong facial expressions and body language. He is simply fantastic in this role. Winona Ryder is equally fine portraying the love-torn lady, Mina Murray, and Count Dracula's bride, Elisabeta. But Keanu Reeves is dry in his role as her fiancˇ, Jonathan Harker, who has been taken captive by the count. My favorite of all the characters is Anthony Hopkins as Professor Van Helsing. He also plays two other roles, but he steals the show as Van Helsing! The special effects in Dracula are outstanding. The castle is spooky. Dracula's changes are spectacular. Even the effect of the spiderwebs is eerie. I thoroughly enjoyed this movie, in spite of the added romance and the dissimilarity to the book. - Rambles |